Skip to content
The Cast Index
EN

Industry / The Journal

The runway’s size-inclusion gap is structural.

The numbers are not a casting footnote. They reveal how sample production, brand decisions and runway imagery keep reinforcing one body standard.

Ashley Graham, whose career is associated with broader size representation in fashion
ATTN: · CC BY 3.0 · Archive photograph

The brief

How size-inclusive were the major fashion runways in 2026?

Size inclusion remained extremely limited. Vogue Business found that 98.6% of 2,523 Autumn/Winter 2026 menswear looks in Milan and Paris were straight-size; only 1.2% were mid-size and 0.2% plus-size. Its Spring/Summer 2026 womenswear analysis similarly found 97.1% of 9,038 looks were straight-size.

What do the 2026 runway numbers show?

Vogue Business assessed 55 Autumn/Winter 2026 menswear shows and presentations across Milan and Paris. Of 2,523 looks, 98.6 per cent were straight-size, 1.2 per cent mid-size and 0.2 per cent plus-size. Milan recorded no mid-size or plus-size looks in that dataset.

Its Spring/Summer 2026 womenswear report covered 9,038 looks across 198 shows in the four major capitals. Straight-size casting accounted for 97.1 per cent, with 2 per cent mid-size and 0.9 per cent plus-size. London performed better than the other capitals, but the overall picture remained narrow.

Why is this a design-system problem as well as a casting problem?

Runway casting happens inside a production system built around samples. When a collection is developed in a narrow sample range, the available cast is restricted before the casting director begins. A wider call cannot solve garments that were never cut for more bodies.

That is why occasional high-profile bookings do not necessarily indicate structural change. Durable inclusion requires design, fitting, production and casting decisions to move together across seasons.

How should a ranking respond to narrow industry standards?

A ranking must report actual demand, which means current bookings remain evidence. But it should not confuse the frequency of a body type with an objective standard of beauty, health or merit.

The Cast Index therefore excludes appearance from its scoring pillars and keeps health information separate from ranking judgements. It can document who the industry books while still making the limits of that industry visible.

Read further

Sources & further reading.

  1. Vogue Business — Autumn/Winter 2026 menswear size inclusivity report
  2. Vogue Business — Spring/Summer 2026 size inclusivity report
  3. The Cast Index — ranking methodology

Updated . Suggest a correction.

A little more perspective.

All stories ↗

A few useful answers

What does straight-size mean in the cited womenswear report?

Vogue Business classified US sizes 0–4 as straight-size, 6–12 as mid-size and 14+ as plus-size for its Spring/Summer 2026 analysis.

Does the Cast Index score models by body size?

No. The scoring pillars are runway, campaigns, editorial authority and cultural impact; appearance and body size are not scoring criteria.