People’s Choice · AW26 · Community vote
People’s
Choice.
Your vote, not our verdict. Back the models and creatives you rate — the board reorders live as votes come in.
The Community Score
A rating you decide.
Every nominee carries a live Community Score out of 100 — driven only by your votes. 100 is the category leader, and a nominee climbs as support grows. It measures popularity, not editorial merit: a new face with passionate backers can outscore a veteran here. That’s the point — it gives newcomers a real shot and a reason to rally people.
Score = 40 + 60 × (a nominee’s votes ÷ the category leader’s votes). For the independent, credits-based rating, open a nominee’s profile — that’s the editorial Index ↗, and it’s separate.
Model of the season
-
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes
Makeup artist
-
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes
Hair stylist
-
Community
–
0 votes
Stylist
-
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes
Photographer
-
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes -
Community
–
0 votes
Recommend someone
Nominate a face.
Think someone belongs on the ballot? Add them for £5. Here’s exactly why there’s a small fee — and why it isn’t pay-to-win:
- →It keeps the board serious. A small fee stops spam and joke entries, so the shortlist stays credible.
- →It funds the work behind a fair vote — email verification, moderation, and anti-fraud checks that cost money to run.
- →It deters manipulation. A per-nominee fee makes bulk gaming uneconomic, protecting genuine nominees.
- →It is not pay-to-win. The fee adds a nominee to the ballot; only verified public votes decide the outcome. Nominating does not buy votes or placement.