Option A
Airbrush Flawless Foundation
Charlotte Tilbury · £40
Full coverage with a blurred, soft-matte finish
Head to head · Complexion
Two long-wear matte foundations, both reformulated within the past year: full soft-matte coverage against oil-free natural matte with the wider shade range.
Option A
Charlotte Tilbury · £40
Full coverage with a blurred, soft-matte finish
Option B
Estée Lauder · £39.50
Long-wear medium-to-full coverage on oily skin
The verdict
Choose Estée Lauder Double Wear if you want oil-free, non-comedogenic, fragrance-free long wear and the widest shade match: 60 shades, natural matte, £39.50. Choose Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless for full coverage with a blurred soft-matte finish in 44 shades at £40, accepting menthol and no SPF. Re-match either: both changed formula recently.
Desk research, not a wear test. Prices are UK guide prices from official pages or named retailers when checked, and may have changed. How we compared.
Side by side
Every row is drawn from the official product page or a named UK retailer listing. Brand wear and performance figures are the brands’ own.
| Specification | Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation | Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation SPF 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Charlotte Tilbury | Estée Lauder |
| Format | Liquid foundation | Liquid foundation |
| Finish | Soft matte | Natural matte |
| Coverage | Full | Buildable medium to full |
| Shades | 44 | 60 |
| SPF | None | SPF 10 |
| Oil-free / non-comedogenic | No claim on the UK page | Both claimed |
| Fragrance | No fragrance-free claim; menthol and alcohol listed | Fragrance-free, per the brand |
| Brand wear claims | Up to 24 hours (305-person consumer test); waterproof, transfer-proof | Up to 36 hours; transfer-proof, waterproof colour |
| Size and UK price | 30ml, £40 | 30ml, £39.50 (pump sold separately) |
| Latest formula | August 2025, with a new shade range | February 2026 in the UK |
| Guide price | £40 | £39.50 |
Checked 25 September 2026. Prices, shade ranges and formulas can change; the official page is the final word.
Which to choose
How we compared
This comparison is desk research. We lined up the two products’ published formulas, ingredient lists, sizes, directions and UK prices from official pages or named UK retailers on 25 September 2026. Neither product was tested in a laboratory or worn by our editors for this page.
There is no overall score. Two well-made products can suit different skin, budgets and routines, so the verdict is framed as “choose this if”. Brand claims are reported as brand claims, and no brand paid to be compared.
Questions
Sources
All sources checked . Spotted an error? Email desk@thecastindex.com or read our corrections policy.
Keep exploring